diff --git a/07/01.sh b/07/01.sh
index 9ae2987..8b6d178 100755
--- a/07/01.sh
+++ b/07/01.sh
@@ -52,5 +52,3 @@ for i in ${!tree[@]}; do
 done
 
 echo $sum
-
-echo ${tree[/jqfwd/hqb/vbzr/gbh/]}
diff --git a/07/02.sh b/07/02.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..bd060ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/07/02.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+pwd=''
+declare -A tree
+
+out="$(while read line; do
+	IFS=' '
+	if [[ "$line" == '$'* ]]; then
+		if [[ "$line" == *'cd'* ]]; then
+			fsd=($line)
+			if [[ ${fsd[2]} == '..' ]]; then
+				pwd="$(sed -E 's/\/[a-z]*$//' <<< "$pwd")"
+			else
+				pwd="$pwd/${fsd[2]}"
+			fi
+		fi
+	else
+		if [[ "$line" != "dir"* ]]; then
+			asd=($line)
+			echo "$pwd/${asd[1]} ${asd[0]}"
+		fi
+	fi
+done < /tmp/07 | sed 's@//@/@g;s@//@/@g')"
+
+last=0
+while read line; do
+	item=${line/ */}
+	value=${line/* /}
+
+	depth=$(($(echo "$line" | grep -o '/' | wc -l)+1))
+
+	IFS='/'
+	for (( i=1; i<$depth; i++ )); do	
+		owo=($item)
+		cur=$(sed 's@ @/@g;s@$@/@' <<< "${owo[@]:0:$i}")
+		tree[$cur]=$((${tree[$cur]}+value))
+		echo "adding from $line to $cur"
+	done
+	unset IFS
+
+#	tree[$item]=$((${tree[$item]}+$value))
+
+done <<< "$out"
+
+#declare -p tree
+sum=0
+#for i in ${!tree[@]}; do
+#	y=$(grep -o '/' <<< "$i" | wc -l)
+#	if [[ "$y" == 2 ]]; then
+#		echo "${tree[$i]} $i"
+#		sum=$((sum+${tree[$i]}))
+#	fi
+#done
+#echo $sum
+
+free=$((70000000-${tree[/]}))
+
+
+echo "free: $free"
+for i in ${!tree[@]}; do
+	if [[ $((free+${tree[$i]})) -ge 30000000 ]]; then
+		echo "${tree[$i]}"
+	fi
+done | sort -n | head -n1
+
diff --git a/07/README.md b/07/README.md
index fa56f31..f5fb758 100644
--- a/07/README.md
+++ b/07/README.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # day 07 (oops, only 09!)
 
-# part 1
+## part 1
 
 UwU finally something **fun**!
 
@@ -19,3 +19,15 @@ i hate how I handled half of the code as a subshell, but I don't
 care enough about it to rewrite it now
 
 Well! onto part 2...
+
+## part 2
+
+Why the hecc did the 1st part deliberately instruct the programmer
+to count directories multiple times, and the 2nd part went "well,
+actually no, we want a proper size, not an imaginary size"???
+
+thankfully, I have decided to write the parser code separate from
+the summing code, so I could just easily throw the 2nd part out
+while keeping the 1st part.
+
+Anyways! that was probably the most fun chall here yet! Neat™!